Screening for Cardiovascular Disease: Above and Beyond a Lipid Panel

By: Dr. Jennifer Paulson, DNP

What are the best cardio-vascular screening tests? 

This is such a common question my patients commonly ask. I have asked myself this question over the years. Knowing I have a strong risk for diabetes and cardiovascular disease, having elevated Lp(a) and turning 51 this past year, I am vested in this topic for both my patients and my personal health.  I have chosen CIMT testing, along with genomics and careful monitoring of my inflammation, metabolic markers, and visceral fat. This blog will break it all down for you. Unfortunately, the standard of care is missing the ball here. I am blessed to have studied from some of the best vascular surgeons and cardiologists whom I admire for their integrative and proactive approach. The standard of care uses a lipid (cholesterol) screening test. And stress tests.

Twenty years ago as an Emergency Room RN, I cared for many men having a heart attack in the wee early morning hours, who were on statins and “passed my stress test last week”.  This was the starting point when I started to question the standard of care for heart disease.

There are many good tests available and I believe that combining more than one is best.  This is a silent disease. You are good, until you are not good. Anyone over age 40 should consider starting screening with more than just a cholesterol panel. 

Why Traditional Heart Screening Falls Short

Most people are told their cardiovascular risk based on a lipid panel (cholesterol test). While useful, this is only a small piece of the puzzle.

The reality:
You can have normal cholesterol and still develop plaque, or elevated cholesterol and no vascular disease at all.

That’s because:

  • Cholesterol is a risk marker, not a direct measure of disease
  • Cardiovascular disease is driven by:
    • inflammation
    • insulin resistance
    • endothelial dysfunction
    • plaque formation

What Matters More: Your Vascular Age

Your vascular age reflects the actual condition of your arteries, not just your lab values.

  • Are your arteries flexible or stiff?
  • Is plaque already forming?
  • Is your risk higher (or lower) than your chronological age?

This is where advanced testing like CIMT becomes powerful.

CIMT is a non-invasive ultrasound that evaluates:

  • thickness of the arterial wall
  • early plaque formation
  • vascular inflammation
  • arterial aging

It allows us to determine your vascular age vs your actual age

Why This Matters

CIMT can detect early disease years before symptoms or events like:

  • heart attack
  • stroke
  • significant blockage

This gives you time to:

✔ intervene early
✔ reverse risk factors
✔ personalize your treatment plan

In 2025, Aspire Wellness hosted Vasolabs for CIMT testing, we scanned nearly 20 patients and more than half of those patients had a vascular age higher than their biologic age. This allows us to address the early disease process, integrate treatment interventions, retest to ensure vascular age is going down, and prevent a future heart attack or stroke. 


Comparing Cardiovascular Screening Options

Here’s how CIMT compares to other common tests:


Lipid Panel (Cholesterol Testing)

Pros

  • inexpensive
  • widely available
  • helpful baseline 
  • often paid for by insurance

Cons

  • poor predictor of actual plaque
  • does NOT show vascular damage
  • misses early disease

Bottom line:
Cholesterol ≠ cardiovascular disease


Advanced Blood Testing (Inflammation, Insulin, Lipoproteins)

Examples:

  • ApoB
  • sdLDL (small dense LDL)
  • Lp(a)
  • hs-CRP
  • fasting insulin

Pros

  • deeper metabolic insight
  • identifies root causes
  • fairly affordable (~$150)

Cons

  • still indirect
  • does not show plaque

Genetics Testing

Pros

  • identifies inherited risk
  • helpful for long-term planning

Cons

  • risk ≠ disease
  • cannot show current vascular status

CAC (Coronary Artery Calcium Score) CT Scan

Pros

  • detects calcified plaque
  • strong predictor of cardiac events

Cons

  • radiation exposure
  • only detects calcified (late-stage) plaque
  • misses early soft plaque, *all plaque starts as soft, takes time to calcify and be detected on this test

CT Angiography

Pros

  • detailed imaging of coronary arteries
  • shows blockages

Cons

  • higher radiation
  • contrast exposure
  • expensive (~$2K)
  • typically used after symptoms develop

CIMT (Carotid Ultrasound)

Pros

  • no radiation
  • detects early + soft plaque
  • measures arterial thickness
  • provides vascular age
  • ideal for prevention

Cons

  • operator-dependent
  • not yet standard in conventional medicine so cash pay investment

Why We Recommend CIMT As Part of Your Health Screenings

At Aspire Wellness, we prioritize:

👉 early detection + prevention

CIMT allows us to:

  • identify disease before it becomes dangerous
  • track progress over time
  • personalize treatment (nutrition, hormones, metabolic care, etc.)

Who Should Consider CIMT?

  • Age 40+
  • Family history of heart disease
  • High stress lifestyle
  • History of:
    • high cholesterol
    • insulin resistance/pre-diabetes, diabetes
    • autoimmune conditions
  • Anyone wanting proactive health insight to focus on healthspan and longevity

Take Control of Your Heart Health

Don’t wait for symptoms.

Don’t rely on outdated markers alone.

Know your vascular age.


📞 Reserve Your Spot Today

Spots are limited and fill quickly.

Contact Aspire Wellness or book online to secure your CIMT screening: 208-607-3738


This information is for educational purposes and is not intended to diagnose or treat medical conditions. Always consult with your healthcare provider for personalized care.


Related Posts: